|
Come Hell or High Water: Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster |  | Author: Michael Eric Dyson
Publisher: Basic Civitas Books
Category: Book
List Price: $15.00
Buy Used: $6.82
as of 9/8/2010 22:47 CDT details
You Save: $8.18 (55%)
New (17) Used (36) from $6.82
Seller: Yankee_Clipper_Books_
Rating:  28 reviews
Sales Rank: 31855
Media: Paperback
Edition: 1
Pages: 288
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.4
Dimensions (in): 8 x 5.4 x 0.9
ISBN: 046501772X
Dewey Decimal Number: 976.044
EAN: 9780465017720
ASIN: 046501772X
Publication Date: July 3, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | ISBN13: 9780465017720 | | • | Condition: New | | • | Notes: BUY WITH CONFIDENCE, Over one million books sold! 98% Positive feedback. Compare our books, prices and service to the competition. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed |
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
When Hurricane Katrina tore through New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, hundreds of thousands were left behind to suffer the ravages of destruction, disease, and even death. The majority of these people were black; nearly all were poor. Displaying the intellectual rigor, political passion, and personal empathy that have won him acclaim and fans all across the color line, Michael Eric Dyson offers a searing assessment of the meaning of Hurricane Katrina. With this clarion call Dyson warns us that we can only find redemption as a society if we acknowledge that Katrina was more than an engineering or emergency response failure. What's at stake is no less than the future of democracy.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 28
 They got both June 30, 2010
Terry Karney
It's not often we get a chance to look at class, poverty and race in a way which isn't almost guaranteed to be polarised at the outset. Having a disaster as impersonal as Katrina gives Dyson just the backdrop needed to show that much of what happened to the poor of New Orleans (and in particular the black poor) was the result of systemic problems; related directly to how we, as a society, treat the poor, and those whom we marginalise, caused much of what what went wrong.
The book doesn't address (at least in the first edition) why it is that New Orleans has not been rebuilt, but the same forces which neglected the city for so long, are probably critical to the lack of real rebuilding.
For anyone who wants a starting point to look at race, and poverty in the United States, this makes a good one. The writing is plain, but not dumbed down, and the bibliography is complete; so the basis for his work is there to be seen; and as a springboard the book is excellent.
 Dark side of America June 21, 2010
Mei
In past decade, one of big natural disaster was Hurricane Katrina hitting New Orleans; a lot of people lost their houses and most of them could not evacuated on time and left behind. In Come Hell or High Water Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster, Michael Eric Dyson presents "unnatural disaster"- man-made disasters, such as poverty, racism and classism" beyond Katrina. Author advocates for black community, emphasizes racial issue and how this issue affects in society.
In Dyson's book, he shows that poor black Americans suffer the damage brought from Katrina. Those affected were from legacy of discrimination and racism and racism creates a gap of unequal treatment comparing with wealthy Caucasian American by the government policies.
To support Dyson's theory, first he points out the primary offenders of this disaster were Bush administration, local and federal government. He shows the detail time line of background of New Orleans, then he approaches Hurricane Katrina to racism and classism; he analyzes natural disaster correlated with unnatural disasters. By time, he explains racial stereotyping in a whole society and media coverage and portrait of blacks.
In explaining racism issue, Dyson quotes CBS's Sunday Morning that "...in New Orleans were white people, they would not have gone for days without food....." (18) By this, that means whites would get help sooner and more effectively. In other word, that is an assumption about whites and blacks are treated different. Clearly this approach was at odds with that expected by readers. That is hard to totally agree Dyson's theory. However, if Dyson emphasizes that the unequal evacuation relates with different of social economic status and people living in New Orleans are poor lower class and they are seldom to vote, so those people only have got lesser attention comparing than rich privilege class. That explanation will be more convinced.
Ironically, the weakness of Dyson's book is his overemphasis of race. He states, "How can race possibly be quarantined from a consideration of Katrina when it so thoroughly pervades blacks culture--the choices we make, the laws we adopt and discard, and the social practices that are polluted by its pestering ubiquity?" (19). Obviously, race plays a role in society, but this is an overstatement. Most decisions people make have nothing to do with race. This overemphasis on race, I believe, leads him to find racial difference in his perception of reality.
To reinforce racism's view that Dyson points out that media exemplifies a low view of blacks. He refers to the Associated Press's report, young blacks "looted" food but whites "found" food. (164) By that caption from report, that means reporter also has its own perception and cultural bias. That is significant aspect of Dyson's book; media creates a negative stereotype of blacks. Obviously, media pay an important role of giving messages in society and media has a way with words to influent image of blacks in society. That is a good reason to explain why blacks couldn't get equal treatment with others because they have bad reputation from media's commentary.
Another questionable aspect of Dyson's book, he constantly decries the inefficiency of the Bush administration, particularly FEM incompetency during this disaster. Dyson clearly points out the incompetence of the administration, the government and FEMA really had no structure in place to handle a natural disaster, particularly their lack of proper coordinating for handling the situation. However, for the incompetency has no relation to racial issues.
Despite these criticisms, Dyson's book does have its positives and we need to judge it in terms of the author's purpose in writing it. It is intended to be a rigorous piece of academic work. After we read Dyson's biography, he is a black academic, an author, radio host and a professor of sociology. We can understand the purpose of his book; he reminds us including society and government "class issue" and "racism" still exit. We shouldn't be ignored them. I agree with Dyson that class certainly had something to do with the response to Katrina and that race probably played a role too. If we consider Dyson as a black academic, he speaks the truth about country's attitudes toward the poor, as well as government's continued refuse to response to these taboo issues. These issues didn't begin with a hurricane; it states that to remind the entire country that we are not a classless society. The book was insightful in many ways, and it provided new information about what really happened.
 Interesting discussion of racial issues relating to Katrina relief--but with problems. December 9, 2009
Lawrence Miley (Plant City, FL)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Michael Eric Dyson, for those who don't know, is a tireless advocate for the black community, a community that he proudly participates in and loves. For better or worse, Dyson has written many books on topics that emphasize and underscore racial issues in American society and how they affect the black community. This book is no different. His primary thesis is that the damage and suffering brought from Katrina would have been ameliorated if, instead of poor blacks, those affected were more affluent or of a whiter complexion. The primary culprit of this, according to Dyson, was the Bush administration, though his ire isn't solely directed at them. There are other emphases as well, including the interplay between racial stereotyping in society as a whole and media coverage and portrayal of blacks.
Regarding the prevalence of racial prejudice, Dyson doesn't claim that overt and explicit racism was the cause of the poor response to Katrina; rather, there was an implicit prejudice or "passive indifference" directed towards poor blacks. Unfortunately, Dyson doesn't proffer many arguments to support this position. The primary argument he gives (and it shows up several times) is simply a thought experiment: if these people were affluent whites, wouldn't help have come sooner and more effectively? He also includes a pointed example in which the media exemplifies this low view of blacks. On the same day, the AP printed two stories with stranded people wading through water with food in hand, one a black man, the other a white man and woman. The picture with the black man had the title referring to his having "looted," while the photo of the white couple was described as having "found" food. (It's hard to evaluate this example in isolation even if it is powerful, for one example does not make a strong case.) Even with the dearth of arguments for this position, some of what he writes weighs against his thesis. For instance, he constantly decries the inefficiency of the Bush administration (particularly FEMA)while giving another detail concerning the administration that (at least) undercuts the argument based upon race: incompetency. Dyson clearly accentuates the incompetence of the administration by detailing how they really had no structure in place to handle a natural disaster, particularly their lack of proper coordinating for handling the situation. Yet this militates against his main thesis, for the incompetency has no relation to racial issues; it was in place prior to the disaster. Of course, this doesn't discount the claim that implicit racism had something to do with the response, but there is an inverse relationship between incompetence and (racial) apathy. The primary problem, I believe, that besets his thesis is that it's quite difficult to argue for specific cases of implicit racism, leaving him to mostly rely upon the thought experiment example.
Dyson lambastes the Bush administration throughout the book. Most of the blame for this catastrophe is placed at their feet. (On a side note, Dyson doesn't tell the reader when he thinks these missteps are the product of indifference towards blacks.) However, it seems that Dyson goes too far in his blame of the Bush administration or--at least--he doesn't adequately support his position. For instance, he complains that FEMA's head knew of the disaster that was coming to New Orleans 3 days before it hit but didn't request troops until 5 hours after it hit. This would be a powerful example if Dyson had shown that FEMA had the authority, without state and local authority, to enter into NO, but he doesn't. Also, it's unclear how much FEMA knew three days before, which is quite important for doling out blame. Further, if what Dyson claims is true, NO mayor Ray Nagin would be the real culprit here for not issuing a mandatory evacuation sooner than the day before the hurricane hit, not using the Amtrak's services before its last run out of town, and not using all of the public transportation devices that, according to Dyson, were later seen swarmed by the flood waters. Dyson is also very critical about the amount of voluntary resources that were turned away by FEMA (e.g., the US BATAAN; Florida Airboat Association). But, again, it's unclear how much blame, if any, should be put on FEMA and its employees for this. If they were obeying the law, then there may not be any blame. At least this is something that is debatable, and it brings up the question of whether blame should be put on the individuals who allowed such laws to come into existence; moreover, it raises the question as to whether less government is better than bigger government in dealing with these situations, something contrary to Dyson's political persuaion. But there is no room for a nuanced discussion on this issue with Dyson; Bush and his crew are guilty, and that's that. (It's also interesting to note that Dyson points out the bureaucratic red tape that prevented New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson from sending Coast Guard troops for quite some time, the problem coming from LO Governmor Blanco not issuing a request, yet there isn't a discussion about blame here.)
Dyson clearly holds a certain level of antipathy for Bush and his political philosophy, and this appears to cloud his judgment on issues in which Bush is related (not unlike many political pundits on both sides of the political aisle). There is a really good example of this clouding of judgment. Shortly after the Federal Government entered the environment in NO, Bush noted that the efforts from the Fed were "not acceptable." Several days later, while outlining his plan to assist NO, Bush claimed that the devastation there was simply too much for the state and local governments to handle, resulting in citizens not getting the help they need and that this was "unacceptable." Dyson claims that Bush was attempting to transfer blame from the federal government to the state and local governments through "word association" (105-06). This is an egregious interpretation of Bush's statements. He didn't even place any blame on the state and local governments in his statement but, rather, on the situation. This is a clear example of Dyson's cloudy judgment regarding Bush and justifies one taking his pronouncements on anything related to Bush with a grain of salt.
Another problem with Dyson's evaluation is his overemphasis of race. He states, "How can race possibly be quarantined from a consideration of Katrina when it so thoroughly pervades our culture--the choices we make, the laws we adopt and discard, and the social practices that are polluted by its pestering ubiquity?" (19). Yes, race plays a role in our society, but this is an overstatement. Most decisions people make have nothing to do with race. This overemphasis on race, I believe, leads him to find racial disparity in every conceivable place. For instance, he spends a few pages discussing how other minorities were affected by and treated after the Katrina disaster. He notes Latinos, Native Americans, and Vietnamese, cites a couple of facts around their departure of NO, and then refers to how the government had abandoned or mistreated them. The problem is that he doesn't really argue for this, or at least he does so poorly. He claims that Latinos didn't receive help because they were afraid to ask, fearing deportation related issues, and that of the 30,000 Vietnamese refugees many were turned away from the Astrodome, yet the precise number isn't given nor are the general numbers of those trying to get into/those rejected entry into the Astrodome.
For those who have seen Dyson give commentary on TV, it's obvious that Dyson has a way with words. He's extremely eloquent in those situations. However, this is not the case when Dyson goes to print. He seems to try too hard to sound profound by using big words and elongated sentences that obfuscate, rather than elucidate, the issue at hand. I can cite one example: "And by raising the problem of evil as an issue that is but one remove from the theological landscape when it probes human responsibility and agency, redistributive theodicy seeks to clarify the ultimate cause of human suffering and disaster" (193). It's unclear, in almost any context, what it means for something to be 'one remove' from something else, and 'theological landscape' is another obscure phrase in this context. The best I can surmise is that Dyson is referring to some sort of freewill defense toward the problem of evil here, but there are much better and clearer ways (e.g., Alvin Plantinga's works) to express this. Another example of Dyson's pedantic tendencies can be found where he explains the etymology of the work 'theodicy'. He correctly notes its origin from the Greek words 'theos' and 'dike', but, for no reason other than to display how learned he is, he provides the Greek for these words; however, there's a problem: the Greek letters he uses for 'theos' are not correct. Of course, how many people know Greek? Not many, so most will just look at this as Dyson even knowing Greek. The point is that even if he knew Greek, the reader gains nothing from this.
Some reviewers have referred to Dyson as a Marxist. I think such labels aren't helpful because they're only used in the pejorative sense. Dyson surely favors more of a "spread the wealth" political philosophy, and there's a nice quote that sums up his views on this matter that some may find informative: "Charity is no substitute for justice. If we never challenge a social order that allows some to accumulate wealth--even if they decide to help the less fortunate--while others are shortchanged, then even acts of kindness end up supporting unjust arrangements. We must never ignore the injustices that make charity necessary, or the inequalities that make it possible" (152).
I had some other problems with Dyson's claims, such as his defense of those who stole non-essential products for no other reason than that they wanted these things, but putting these aside, the book does have its positives. The most important--though exaggerated--was that racial issues are still present and shouldn't be ignored even in a society that has a (half-)black president. I agree with Dyson that class certainly had something to do with the response to Katrina and that race probably played a role too, even though I'm not convinced that Dyson's account of the extent to which this was present is correct. I'll end by noting that according to Dyson, 67% of New Orleans was black during the time of Katrina, yet (from another source) only 49% of the casualties were black. This number is at least food for thought, especially considering Dyson's emphasis on the fact that the communities that were hit the most (i.e., the poor) had a higher concentration of blacks than the general populace.
Why not talk to the people of New Orleans? April 27, 2009
Tuli (Manhattan, NY)
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
Dyson, of course, is brilliant and he places the Katrina disaster in the context of race relations in the United States, but the book would have been greatly enriched by a few research trips to New Orleans to interview actual eye witnesses to get their perspectives on race and the handling of the aftermath of Katrina.
 This guy belongs on "IN LIVING COLOR" August 7, 2007
David S. Rhodes (Scottsdale, AZ United States)
5 out of 22 found this review helpful
This author reminds of a character played on In Living Color where Damon Wayans is a convict that tries to use as many multi-syllabic words as he can so he can SOUND intelligent. This author is not.
This book is nothing more than an appeal to left-wing wackos suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 28
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME. www.LegendofTupac.com | |
